← All posts

Guides

A Safe Stylish Alternative for Custom Website CSS

If you are looking for a safe Stylish alternative for custom website styles, you have probably read something about the extension's history and want a tool you can trust. This guide covers that history factually, looks fairly at Stylus, and explains where JustZix fits — so you can choose with clear information rather than rumor.

What Stylish did, and the history

Stylish was a popular extension for applying custom CSS — "userstyles" — to websites. It let you install themes and tweaks from a community catalog and made restyling pages easy for non-developers.

Here is the part to state carefully. Some years ago, Stylish drew widely reported criticism over collecting users' browsing data after a change of ownership. That reporting is part of the public record. We are not going to exaggerate it or imply anything beyond what was reported — and tools and ownership can change over time. The practical takeaway for a reader today is simple: when an extension can see every page you visit, it is reasonable to care about its data practices and to prefer transparent ones.

What to look for in a safe alternative

Rather than judging by reputation alone, judge by properties you can check:

Stylus — the open-source CSS-focused option

The most common recommendation, and a fair one, is Stylus. Important: Stylus is a separate, independent, open-source project — not the same thing as Stylish despite the similar name. It is CSS-focused, has a capable editor, supports the UserCSS format, and because it is open source its behavior can be audited.

Stylus is a strong pick when: you only need CSS, want a focused styling tool, and value an open-source codebase. It does exactly one job and does it well.

JustZix — CSS, JavaScript and dev tools, no telemetry

JustZix is a free Chrome extension (also Edge, Brave, Opera, Vivaldi) that injects custom CSS and JavaScript into pages via rules matched on URL patterns. It requires no account and runs no telemetry.

Compared with a CSS-only tool, JustZix gives you more reach when you need it:

On the data question — the thing this whole article is about — JustZix's position is that it has no telemetry. Sync is opt-in and key-based. You can read the full feature breakdown on the features page.

A practical example

Say a site uses a font you find hard to read. A scoped rule in JustZix for https://news.example.com/* with this CSS fixes it:

/* More readable body text */
article, .post-body, p {
  font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif !important;
  font-size: 19px !important;
  line-height: 1.7 !important;
}

The same job works in Stylus. The difference shows up when you also want behavior — for example, auto-expanding "read more" sections — which needs JavaScript.

CSS-only or CSS plus JS?

This is the real decision:

Both can be "safe." Safety is about data practices and transparency, not about whether the tool also runs JavaScript.

How to choose

NeedRecommended
CSS only, open sourceStylus
CSS + JS, dev tools, no telemetryJustZix
Install community themesStylus (UserCSS catalog)
Sync without an accountJustZix (key-based)

Bottom line

The Stylish history is a fair reason to choose carefully — but the lesson is to pick a tool with transparent data practices, not to be afraid of custom CSS in general. Stylus and JustZix are both reasonable, honest choices; the right one depends on whether you also need JavaScript.

See also

If a no-telemetry, no-account tool that handles both CSS and JS sounds right, JustZix is free — visit the download page to install it.

Rate this post

No ratings yet — be the first.

Try it yourself

Install JustZix and paste any snippet from this article. Two minutes from zero to a working rule across all your devices.

Get JustZix

Features · How it works · Examples · Use cases